Arizona Republicans to release findings of widely panned election audit

By Nathan Layne

(Reuters) – Arizona Republican senators who commissioned an audit of the 2020 presidential election will announce their findings on Friday, concluding a widely criticized effort spurred by Donald Trump’s false claims of widespread electoral fraud.

The results of what the state lawmakers are calling a “forensic audit” into the former president’s loss in Maricopa, Arizona’s most populous county, will be revealed in the state Senate at 1 p.m. local time (4 p.m. Eastern/2000 GMT), five months after the Republican-led Senate launched the review.

A wide array of election experts, Democrats and some Republican officials have rejected the audit as a highly partisan boondoggle run by contractors without relevant expertise who are out to prove that Trump won last November, regardless of the facts.

Even so, the report has been eagerly anticipated by Trump’s allies in his Republican Party, some of whom have been keen to use it to justify similar “forensic” investigations in Pennsylvania, Michigan and other battleground states that Trump lost to Democratic President Joe Biden.

Trump himself has predicted the report would provide the evidence to support his fraud claims. So far no such proof has been produced either by Trump or his backers.

Biden beat Trump in Arizona by a margin of just over 10,000 votes, a narrow victory confirmed by a hand recount and multiple post-election tests for accuracy. Election officials in Maricopa, which includes Phoenix, also conducted a separate audit that confirmed the vote was accurate and secure.

To lead the latest review of 2.1 million votes in Maricopa County, the Republican-led Arizona Senate chose Cyber Ninjas, an obscure firm with no prior experience auditing elections whose owner, Doug Logan, has promoted conspiracy theories backing Trump’s assertions.

The audit has been marked by practices that critics described as ranging from inappropriate to bizarre, including counters marking ballots with blue ink, which can alter how they are read by machines, and workers checking for traces of bamboo fibers based on a conspiracy theory that forged ballots may have been shipped in from Asia.

Launched in late April with the goal of wrapping up in May, the operation has progressed more slowly than planned, most recently being delayed because Logan and others on his team became infected with the coronavirus.

The make-up of the audit’s financial backers has also raised alarms. In June, Logan disclosed that outside groups tied to key boosters of Trump’s efforts to undermine the 2020 election results had raised more than $5.7 million for the audit, far surpassing the $150,000 contributed by the Arizona Senate.

The review has split leading Republicans in the state, with Trump loyalists pitted against Maricopa County officials who have repeatedly defended the election results as accurate.

Prior to the report’s release, Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer issued a 38-page statement criticizing the audit as “slipshod” and detailing why he believes the 2020 result was valid.

“Nobody stole Maricopa County’s election. Elections in Maricopa County aren’t rigged,” wrote Richer, a Republican who says he campaigned and voted for Trump.

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, also released a preemptive rebuttal, a 122-page statement in which she blasted the audit for delays and alleged lapses in security, transparency and organization.

Hobbs accused Cyber Ninjas of not understanding election procedures and said their findings should be considered “invalid and unreliable.”

According to an advisory for the event, the audit team will present the report to Senate President Karen Fann and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Warren Petersen, both Republicans who have spearheaded the election review. Media will not be allowed to ask questions at the hearing, which will be livestreamed, it said.

(reporting by Nathan Layne in Wilton, Connecticut; Editing by Soyoung Kim and Sonya Hepinstall)

View original article here Source